"The European Commission has developed its own evidence to avoid an overly stringent regulation of these hazardous substances."
"Everything, or almost everything, is contained in a few words: “(Endocrine disruptors) can ... be treated like most other substances of concern for human health and the environment.” It is on this simple phrase, which comes from the conclusion of an opinion from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2013, that Brussels bases its plan to regulate endocrine disruptors, these ubiquitous substances capable of interfering with the hormonal system, often at low doses.
The proposal, which is due to be voted on by the Member States soon, has not only France, Denmark and Sweden united against it but also all the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who consider that it does not protect public health and the environment.
The key phrase on which the regulatory edifice proposed by the Commission is built had been drafted even before any scientific expertise had really begun.The expert scientific community, embodied by the Endocrine Society - a scholarly society that brings together some 18,000 researchers and clinicians specializing in the hormonal system – is also battling against the proposal. This opposition is surprising given that the European Commission insists that it relies on science, in the form of the scientific expertise of EFSA."
Stéphane Horel reports for Le Monde (translation via Environmental Health News) December 1, 2016, in the first of three parts.
SEE ALSO:
Part 2: "Endocrine Disruptors: A Denial Of The State Of The Science." (EHN)
Part 3: "Endocrine Disruptors: The Interference Of The United States." (EHN)
