"The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday proposed the nation's first federal rules for the disposal of contaminant-laden ash from coal-fired power plants, but delayed a decision for at least three months on whether coal ash should be regulated as a hazardous substance.
The ash contains the contaminated remains of coal, including mercury, arsenic, cadmium and other substances that can cause cancer and other illnesses. The EPA's testing has shown that without protections, these contaminants can find their way into drinking water supplies.
Only if the EPA declares coal ash is hazardous will it be able to enforce tougher rules nationwide. The other option would let EPA set standards, but the federal agency wouldn't have oversight or enforcement power. States or individuals would have to file lawsuits to try to get waste disposal site managers to comply. The EPA will decide after a 90-day comment period."
Renee Schoof reports for McClatchy Newspapers May 4, 2010.
"Obama EPA Punts on Coal Ash Regulations" (Coal Tattoo)
"E.P.A.’s Plan to Regulate Coal Ash Draws Criticism" (New York Times)
"EPA's New Coal-Ash Rules -- a Punt, or a Feint?" (B'More Green)
"EPA Ash Pond Options Include Closing, Liners" (Louisville Courier-Journal)
"EPA Proposes Coal Ash Rule, Sets Time for Comment" (AP)
Business View: "Georgia Power Ponders New Coal Ash Rules" (Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
Opinion: "EPA's Coal Ash Announcement Reflects Unfortunate White House Meddling in Rulemaking Process" (Huffington Post)
Business View: "Lawyers Weigh in on EPA Coal Ash Plans" (BLT/Legal Times)
"Coal Ash Chickens: Does EPA Need New Disaster for Hazardous Ruling?" (Huffington Post)
"EPA Moves to Regulate Toxic Coal Waste Spotlighted in Center Investigation" (Center for Public Integrity)
Opinion: "White House Sidelines the Public in Coal Ash Debate" (OMB Watch)
"White House, EPA at Odds Over Coal-Waste Rules" (Wall Street Journal)