Recommended reading [1]
About the craft
- Curtis Brainard, "Transparency watch: A closed door," [2] Columbia Journalism Review, September/October, 2011.
- Jim Bruggers, " [3]Covering science and the environment between the tweets," [3] Watchdog Earth, Oct. 15, 2011.
- Declan Fahy, Matthew Nisbet, "The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices," [4] ClimateShift, Sept. 28. 2011.
- James Fahn, "Hooking the reader: Dublin meeting highlights reporting challenges related to oceans, seafood," [5]Columbia Journalism Review, Oct. 13, 2011.
- Sallie Robins, "Science journalism in crisis," [6] The Euroscientist, July 2, 2009.
- Joel Mackower, "Are environmental journalists an endangered species?" [7] Huffington Post, Dec. 18, 2008.
- Dan Fagin, "Science and journalism fail to connect," [8] Nieman Reports, Nov. 1, 2005.
- Bill Moyers, "How do we cover penguins and politics of denial?" [9] Nieman Reports, Winter, 2005.
- Max Boykoff, "The disconnect of news reporting from scientific evidence," [10]Nieman Reports, Winter, 2005.
- Sharon Dunwoody, "Weight of evidence reporting: What is it? Why use it?" [11] Nieman Reports, Winter, 2005.
Reporting major issues
- Bud Ward, "Communicating on Climate Change," [12] Metcalf Institute for Marine and Environmental Reporting, 2008. (PDF)
- Asahi Shimbun, "Fukushima disaster raised questions about newspaper reporting" [13] (editorial), Oct. 15, 2011.
- Curtis Brainard, "James Astill on covering forecasts," [14] Columbia Journalism Review, Oct. 14, 2011.
- Irene M. Wielawski, "A frustrating AP series on nuclear safety," [15] Columbia Journalism Review, Sept. 28, 2011.
- Ryan Chittum, "L.A. Times on why Solyndra dazzled the private and public sectors," [16]Columbia Journalism Review, Sept. 26, 2011.