"The lead researcher, Bradley C. Johnston, said he was not required to report his past relationship with a powerful industry trade group."

"A surprising new study challenged decades of nutrition advice and gave consumers the green light to eat more red and processed meat. But what the study didn’t say is that its lead author has past research ties to the meat and food industry.

The new report, published this week in the Annals of Internal Medicine, stunned scientists and public health officials because it contradicted longstanding nutrition guidelines about limiting consumption of red and processed meats. The analysis, led by Bradley C. Johnston, an epidemiologist at Dalhousie University in Canada, and more than a dozen researchers concluded that warnings linking meat consumption to heart disease and cancer are not backed by strong scientific evidence.

Several prominent nutrition scientists and health organizations criticized the study’s methods and findings. But Dr. Johnston and his colleagues defended the work, saying it relied on the highest standards of scientific evidence, and noted that the large team of investigators reported no conflicts of interest and conducted the review without outside funding."

Tara Parker-Pope and Anahad O’Connor report for the New York Times October 4, 2019. [2]

SEE ALSO:

"As Beef Comes Under Fire for Climate Impacts, the Industry Fights Back" (InsideClimate News) [3]

"More Studies Like the Red Meat Flip-Flop Are Coming" (Slate) [4]

"Red Meat Is Just the Latest Food-Science Fake Out" (Outside) [5]

"Meat Is Unhealthy, Meat Is Okay: Why Science Keeps Overturning What We Thought We Knew" (Vox) [6]

"Uproar After Research Claims Red Meat Poses No Health Risk" (Guardian) [7]