SEJ
Published on SEJ (https://www.sej.org)

Home > "Bristol Bay: EPA Deleted Scientists' Concerns About Pebble Analysis"

"Bristol Bay: EPA Deleted Scientists' Concerns About Pebble Analysis" [1]

"EPA scientists wanted their agency to ask for a new environmental review of the proposed Pebble mine project but were overridden by political staffers, according to several sources and a key document obtained by E&E News.

The scientists gave their agency two options for input on the proposed Pebble mine. The Trump administration picked the one that did not threaten to delay a final decision on the Alaska project until after the 2020 election.

A draft of those comments obtained by E&E News shows EPA career staff recommended that the agency ask the Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a new environmental review for the massive copper and gold mine planned upstream from Alaska's premier salmon fishery. The draft comments also included harsher and more specific criticisms of the environmental review than what the agency ultimately sent to the Army Corps."

Ariel Wittenberg and Dylan Brown report for Greenwire August 16, 2019. [2]

Environmental Health [3]
Environmental Politics [4]
Fish & Fisheries [5]
Journalism & Media [6]
Laws & Regulations [7]
Natural Resources [8]
Pollution [9]
Science [10]
Water & Oceans [11]
National (U.S.) [12]
Alaska and Hawaii [13]
Public [14]
Source: Greenwire [2], 08/19/2019
  • Contact Us  |
  • Donate  |
  • Join  |
  • Members  |
  • Privacy & Security Policies  |
  • Reach SEJ Members  |
  • Renew  |
  • Site Map
The Society of Environmental Journalists
1629 K Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 558-2055
Email: sej@sej.org
© 2026 The Society of Environmental Journalists. All Rights Reserved.
All graphics © SEJ, unless otherwise stated.

Source URL:https://www.sej.org/headlines/bristol-bay-epa-deleted-scientists-concerns-about-pebble-analysis

Links
[1] https://www.sej.org/headlines/bristol-bay-epa-deleted-scientists-concerns-about-pebble-analysis [2] https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060971569 [3] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/environmental-health [4] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/environmental-politics [5] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/fisheries [6] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/journalism/media [7] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/laws [8] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/land [9] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/pollution [10] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/science [11] https://www.sej.org/category/topics-beat/water [12] https://www.sej.org/category/region/national [13] https://www.sej.org/category/region/national/alaska-and-hawaii [14] https://www.sej.org/taxonomy/term/81