Pittsburgh and Flint: Privatizing Water Systems May Have Dire Consequences

 

"The lead crises in Flint and Pittsburgh have many unfortunate parallels. Residents of both cities unknowingly drank water with high levels of the potent neurotoxin, which has long-term health consequences. The rise in lead levels was preceded in both cases by a miscalculation related to chemicals used to control corrosion in water pipes. And in both places, officials have faced criticism for their inaction and failure to alert the public.

The two lead crises have another important thing in common: a private water company named Veolia. The world’s largest supplier of water services, Veolia had contracts with both Flint and Pittsburgh around the time that lead levels rose in their drinking water. And in both places, Veolia wound up in legal disputes over its role in the crises.

In Flint, where Veolia had a small contract to improve water quality in 2015, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette sued the company in 2016. Though the initial elevation of lead levels there has been traced to the city’s decision to switch its water source from Lake Huron to the Flint River, which occurred before the city hired Veolia, the pending case charges the company with “professional negligence and fraud, which caused Flint’s lead poisoning problem to continue and worsen, and created an ongoing public nuisance.”"

Sharon Lerner and Leana Hosea report for The Intercept May 20, 2018.

SEE ALSO:

"Private Water Firms Tap Profit From Struggling Public Utilities" (Bloomberg Environment)

"Making Big Bucks Off Water: Private, For-Profit Water Companies Charge 58% More Than The Government, Report Finds" (Salon)

"America Can’t Trust Public Water, So It’s Turning To Private Companies" (Quartz)

"Water Privatization: Facts and Figures" (Food & Water Watch)

Source: The Intercept, 05/22/2018